Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neonode
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 (talk) 11:31, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Neonode (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly referenced and rather promotional, with most of the content about their products and not the company. I figured, being a 20+ YO listed company, there must be plenty of sources available to support this, but actually found nothing beyond the usual primary ones. Hence, fails WP:GNG. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:05, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, Engineering, and Sweden. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:05, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.