Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navigrid (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:13, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Navigrid

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Navigrid
• Articles for deletion/Navigrid (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Navigrid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This had no consensus in 2009 AfD. Does have some coverage, but I don't see that it meets WP:GNG or another other part of WP:NOTABILITY. With this having waited in CAT:NN for over 11 years, I hope we can now resolve it one way or the other. Boleyn (talk) 13:44, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Logic-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 13:54, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 13:54, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Delete being in BBC MindGames Magazine should give it some notability but i could not find anything also it supposedly has some links to the daily mail but i couldn't find anything on it as well. Lastly it fails WP:GNG so should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CreativeNorth (talk • contribs) 14:07, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

• Merge to Logic puzzle As another WP:ATD we could create a list of Logic Based puzzles. Lightburst (talk) 18:01, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon 06:46, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

• Delete - Not seeing enough to satisfy WP:GNG here. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 19:42, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.