Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nature

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and go to Outer space (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:42, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nature

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nature is so cruel (dangerous/disgusting animals, natural disasters, tall cliffs that lead to falling deaths, etc.) that we are better off living in an artificial world like in the 2012 animated movie The Lorax.^{[April Fools!]} ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 00:00, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nature (journal) instead. I'm too poor to afford their paywalls.^{[April Fools!]} Nrco0e (talk) 00:27, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as threatening attack page. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:43, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as a CEO of a monopolistic fossil fuel company actively working to destroy it, WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Very Rich Billionarire (talk) 05:43, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per above. Trees and forests are useless and ugly, they're better replaced by beautiful factories that actually work to improve humanity. 💜 melecie talk - 06:25, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.