Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural Intelligence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:09, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Natural Intelligence

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searches were difficult due to the commonality of the term, but failed to find enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to show it passes either WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Was moved directly to mainspace from AfC after being declined there. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:03, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:03, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:45, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:45, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:45, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Billion dollar bootstrap unicorn. Sources: [1][2][3][4].Icewhiz (talk) 19:28, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Well sourced and notable.--Geewhiz (talk) 20:30, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Full disclosure, I wrote this article. I also added now a footnote to the article from Scotsman Guide. Following the note from Icewhiz I'd like to add this bootstrap company was in stealth mode until mid 2018. That explains why a Billion dollar bootstrap unicorn doesn't have much coverage yet .--User:Avivdc (talk) 06:30, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SNOW keep. sourcing is there to support notability. It just is.E.M.Gregory (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.