Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nate Gold
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Withdrawn (non-admin closure) Edgepedia (talk) 13:15, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Nate Gold (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable minor leaguer. PRODded, but subsequently DEPRODed with deprodder saying a he played in Taiwain, though nowhere in the article is that claim stated or cited. Alex (talk) 16:52, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep A simple Google search could demonstrate that Hit bull win steak was right when he deprodded the article and said he meets BASE/N. Gold played for the La New Bears of CPBL in 2009, meaning he automatically qualifies under notability guidelines.[1][2] Granted, the article needs serious improvement, but nominating it for deletion rather than adding to the article when you were told he is notable? – Muboshgu (talk) 16:59, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:59, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe he was lying. Alex (talk) 17:01, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- "Maybe he was lying"?? First of all, I find HBWS to be beyond reproach. Why would he lie? Secondly, it's YOUR responsibility to check out a claim like that prior to nominating for deletion. I'm glad you withdrew this request, but seriously, this is a waste of your time, my time, and the time of the closing admin, which could have been very easily avoided. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:17, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe he was lying. Alex (talk) 17:01, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination withdrawn. Claim verified. Nomination withdrawn. Alex (talk) 17:13, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.