Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NOGIntelligence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 20:16, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NOGIntelligence

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

insufficient third party evidence for notability DGG ( talk ) 17:12, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as my searches found nothing aside from this and this. SwisterTwister talk 17:19, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:18, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 00:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG. ukexpat (talk) 15:43, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.