Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mycopernic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 23:45, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mycopernic

This was up for CSD, but it should be discussed just like the two related products. Copernic Desktop Search and Copernic Agent. Irbisgreif (talk) 20:37, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My opinion is that it should be merged, just like Copernic Desktop Search and Copernic Agent. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Irbisgreif (talk • contribs) 20:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- (X! · talk) · @926 · 21:13, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - really, I don't think there's anything to merge. This article is a laundry list of specifications and not-reliably-sourced descriptions. There's nothing that the main company article needs from here. --B (talk) 21:14, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Gnews has 2 entries for this article, both press releases. I agree with B that there's not enough information of value to even bother with a merge. -- Atama ^chat 22:31, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – At the least it would need a complete re-write. There are no sources except for the company web site, and I can't find any secondary sources. So there's nothing to re-write it from, and it's not notable. Rees11 (talk) 10:54, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Teh current edition of the article is part advertisement and part product spec sheet with nothing useful to merge to the company article. -- Whpq (talk) 14:53, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.