Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myah Marie (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:31, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Myah Marie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC. Subject has not received significant coverage in reliable sources. A Google search produces only passing mentions and promotional content. Current references are only credits from discogs.com and allmusic.com, chart position from Billboard (none of which provide significant coverage), a genealogy website, and other Wikipedia articles (which are not reliable sources). Article has been deleted twice already. Hirolovesswords (talk) 21:10, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 00:44, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When I brought the article back, I specifically looked for and included external references that were non-trivial. You can see them in my last update to the article. I don't know why that entire section about the controversy regarding whether Myah Marie dubbed Britney Spears was removed, and the references that go with it. As far as I can see, that's exactly what makes her notable -- it's what the articles about her in multiple media outlets are about. I'll put that section back, which should address the concern regarding references. Geoff Canyon (talk) 08:42, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added further references to the rumor that Myah Marie's voice is on Britney Spears's album. There's no shortage of articles like this available, all featuring Myah Marie prominently. I think the rumors make Myah Marie notable. Geoff Canyon (talk) 17:07, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 00:44, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:57, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 16:00, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 June 28. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:34, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete: While there is some coverage, they are all in the context of another person and are only short paragraphs (weaker than direct coverage), which fails WP:BASIC. Esquivalience ^t 14:35, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
More inclined to delete as there isn't even the least considerably good coverage about her and News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary found nothing good aside from various browser links for the Britney Spears songs. She's mentioned at some of the song articles which should suffice. There's nothing to improve or add to this article aside from the biggest thing of notability being the Britney Spears connection. SwisterTwister talk 18:09, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.