Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MultiSafepay
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 23:09, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- MultiSafepay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I have originally prodded it under the following rationale (which I believe is still valid): "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement." It has since been deprodded by creator, User:GameLegend, who added some sources and asked me for a re-review. Unfortunately, I do not believe that the article, even with the new sources, meets the cited policies; the added sources don't seem reliable/mainstream enough to change my original assessment. Time for a wider community discussion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:35, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:13, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 06:07, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.