Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Movement for Peace and Socialism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 15:34, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Movement for Peace and Socialism

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite the high-sounding name, this "Movement for Peace and Socialism" is a de facto unknown party. Its founder, Nino Pasti, is certainly encyclopedic, even if he does not have his own page in enwikipedia, but the same cannot be said of this micro underground movement. On the web there are very few mentions of this party, in sources that in any case do not deal with this party but refer exclusively to the activity of Nino Pasti. Finally, the page states that this party still exists, but in reality there is currently not the slightest trace of this party. Scia Della Cometa (talk) 13:39, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Italy. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:55, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A political party is relevant for Wikipedia not just because of its electoral results, but also because of its longevity and relevance. This extra-parliamentary party is little-known today, but clearly deserves a space in our encyclopedia, whose whose greatness lies specifically in gathering and organising infos which would be difficult to find elsewhere. It may be difficult to find sources on an old minor political party, but the MPS counts 8,000+ Google hits and even some Google Books hits (also in German). --Checco (talk) 14:39, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - rather obscure party, the artiicle doesn't have any WP:RS. Also, no inherent notability: the fact that a party exists/existed doesn't mean it deserves an article in Wikipedia. P1221 (talk) 09:27, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:55, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – no sources are given for the existence and relevance of this party. Yakme (talk) 14:41, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.