Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morning Coffee (Firefox add-on)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 18:34, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Morning Coffee (Firefox add-on)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable product with no indication of notability. Wcheck (talk) 19:38, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to List of Firefox extensions. The Lifehacker post might be reliable but it's hardly substantial. --Pnm (talk) 02:50, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy If the article is deleted, could the closing admin please userfy the article. —Mike moral ♪♫ 07:50, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Full coverage in Washington Post [1], multiple short but not trivial coverage elsewhere (e.g. [2] , [3] but also others, check [4]), meets WP:GNG.--Cyclopia ^talk 01:21, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep mainly based on the PC World coverage (cited above based on its reprint in the Washington Post) and other sources. Could also quite reasonably be merged, Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 06:01, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - PC world coverage. Washington Post coverage.--BabbaQ (talk) 12:31, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Change to weak keep. The PC world article is good. I have to wonder whether we'll want to keep this article in 5-10 years, but as I see it it meets WP:GNG. --Pnm (talk) 16:33, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets WP:GNG, significant coverage in multiple sources Spatulli (talk) 17:13, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.