Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moq (library)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 17:54, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moq (library)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced and I couldn't find any material to indicate notability when I ran a search. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:02, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →TSU ^tp* 15:49, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unsourced article even after 2 weeks of AfD, indicating that it fails WP:V or at least WP:V#Notability. Sandstein 05:59, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete haven't found anything to show this is notable. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:54, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.