Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moose (drinking game) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:59, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moose (drinking game)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced for six years. Didn't find much beyond rules on "how to play drinking games" pages, some of which are probably copied form this article. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:25, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:25, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:25, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note on the backstory of this article as it's a little confusing: From what I can piece together, there was a previous version of this created in 2005 that was deleted as nonsense. It was recreated as an article about the game in 2006. That version was the subject of the previous AFD in 2007. In 2011 that page was moved to Moose (game), and in 2013 that page was redirected to the one currently under discussion. This is obviously not optimal as it obscures the history, but the redirected article also had no valid references attached. If consensus is to delete the redirected page should go with it in my opinion. If consensus is to keep it, I think a history merge may be in order, and a tag for the previous AFD should be applied to the talk page (due to the above described series of events I was completely unaware of the previous AFD when nominating) Beeblebrox (talk) 21:36, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No sources and no engagement; candidate for draftification? try one more re-list to see if there is any engagement
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Britishfinance (talk) 01:10, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not give enough sources or info and doesn't benefit reader. Dellwood546 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:37, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not a notable drinking game. Lightburst (talk) 01:51, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.