Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly Cavalli
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 16:58, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
- Molly Cavalli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article seems to fail WP:PORNBIO and WP:GNG. The actress in question has been nominated once in a number of AVN categories, but has not won yet. Seems like a case of WP:TOOSOON. BenTels (talk) 15:13, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete I don't see sourcing that that would demonstrate notability under GNG, just a couple reprinted press releases. Agree that the award nom doesn't meet PORNBIO. --j⚛e deckertalk 17:22, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. The strongest claim to notability is WP:FILMMAKER and she comes up short there. Her work needs to be acknowledged by more sources than AVN. She fails PORNBIO with just a scene nomination. Also fails GNG. • Gene93k (talk) 19:40, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.