Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modified Dietz method
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. KTC (talk) 13:14, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- Modified Dietz method (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability of this method, as only source is from the namesake of the method. Wiki pages that link to this page are simply from "See other" sections. Primefac (talk) 21:51, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep A curosry google books search shows that this is a standard method for calculating the value of a portfolio. I just added a couple refererced expansions of the header (from said books) and it appears other recent modifications have been made to improve refererces from external sources. —Noah (talk) 22:38, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- I should have added "the value of a portfolio... and a very notable forumla within the financial realm." —Noah (talk) 22:51, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 23:57, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep meets WP:GNG. His 1966 book describing the method is called "seminal" in secondary sources, and the method itself or modifications thereof has been and is in widespread use. -- Sam Sing! 23:31, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.