Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modelio
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Modelio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I cannot find any news references to the software. The only thing I've found is a short release at http://www.programmez.com/actualites.php?titre_actu=Modeliosoft-sort-un-nouvel-outil-de-modelisation--Modelio&id_actu=4595 and it is in French. The translation is little more than an announcement. If there are other sources I don't know about, please indicate them here. Something this new that has generated enough of a following to be notable should be easy to find. Shadowjams (talk) 19:25, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 03:10, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. Like Shadowjams, the only thing I found is the article at Programmez. I'm not quite as convinced it's a straight press release (Frédéric Mazué's French Wikipedia user page says he's the editor of the magazine and before that a freelance journalist, where press releases don't usually have a byline), it's just not enough on its own for notability. The software's only been out for three months - no prejudice against recreation in the future if the software becomes notable.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:05, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.