Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mockrunner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 13:00, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mockrunner

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN product. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:29, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:45, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:45, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up a few blog entries and how-to's but no significant RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 11:29, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unless if software notability is added.--Deletapedia (talk) 18:26, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 00:52, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 11:47, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete My sweeps of US news, Britain, computing news, business, did not find any mentions.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 00:48, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.