Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MixRank
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:45, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- MixRank (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability, advertisement, orphan Notnoteworthy (talk) 06:36, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 09:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 09:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Maybe it's WP:TOOSOON for this 2-year-old company to have achieved any notability. All that is shown by the references is that they got some investors. The two Reliable Source citations in the article, Wired and Forbes, are only passing mentions. At this point the company fails WP:CORP. --MelanieN (talk) 16:55, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 08:37, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 16:26, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.