Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mission 11 July

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mission 11 July

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only 1 reliable review from The Indian Express. Other sources are about the actress Nattasha Singh and glamsham.com is questionable. In my search, I found this, which adds nothing. Another reliable review can save this film. Else redirect to Nattasha Singh. DareshMohan (talk) 04:18, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:24, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I didn’t search hard but what about this?-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:45, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
+this. Film quoted here and in "The Shifting Terrains of Nationalism and Patriotism in Indian Cinemas" (article published here) (simple mentions but which indicates it's been noted as a film on terrorism and relates it to a more general trend, which the article can mention). Not a great source but the film has been called "a debacle of Bollywood debut" for Singh. All in all there seems to be enough in English only at least to expand the article, verify things, and attest some notability. For me it's a Keep.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 19:13, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The NewsBlaze plot summary (not a review) is functionally illiterate and clearly wasn't edited despite being on the main (Australian) NewsBlaze site. Master's theses are not reliable sources. Passing mentions do not contribute to notability in any capacity. JoelleJay (talk) 00:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No appreciable coverage in RS. The Indian Express piece is just 7 short sentences of mostly snark, which is hardly SIGCOV.

JoelleJay (talk) 00:58, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:57, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per above. killer bee  09:24, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.