Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misato Katsuragi's Reporting Plan

Misato Katsuragi's Reporting Plan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage for this "game". There's a Famitsu release announcement of the game: [1], Inside news story announcing the shutdown of the service: [2]. Short list entries by Keen Gamer and CBR: [3], [4]. Suggesting redirect to List of Neon Genesis Evangelion video games per WP:ATD. Mika1h (talk) 13:20, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Anime and manga, and Japan. Mika1h (talk) 13:20, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:30, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - no indication of a foreign language-competent WP:BEFORE. From a quick search, there is a cnet announcement when it launched, this piece in Markezine (published by Shōeisha), and this in Gigazine describing it as groundbreaking. No reason to believe there isn't more (in addition to the coverage already in the article), but combined, this is enough for GNG. DCsansei (talk) 02:05, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A bit rich calling me incompetent and then posting a bunch of sources that are basically glorified press releases. --Mika1h (talk) 08:44, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I think there's enough for this game to meet GNG. In addition to the mentioned sources, there is coverage from 4Gamer and Inside which are reliable per WP:VG/RS. MidnightMayhem (talk) 03:12, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Per nom. None of the sources shown have given me the impression they are any more than WP:MILL release announcements when run through a translation tool. They aren't WP:SIGCOV and there is no indication that there are more detailed reviews out there. If anything, bringing up these sources as the "best" made me far more confident in its non-notability. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:34, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Neon Genesis Evangelion video games – Per above. Svartner (talk) 13:57, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above - whilst there are some alright sources, we could characterise most of these as WP:ROUTINE pre-release coverage as is normal for games media when commenting on press releases or announcements of a game or service. That alone tends not to be enough to get over the line. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 22:08, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Sufficient coverage and passes GNG. Go D. Usopp (talk) 02:13, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Misato Katsuragi has a page, so perhaps another merge target to consider? IgelRM (talk) 18:30, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Misato Katsuragi Agnieszka653 (talk) 00:22, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Neon Genesis Evangelion video games-is a better option I see, as went through the suggested additions of citations and they do seem to suggest a more press release like tone, than actual reviews or in depth coverage. Not opposed to the suggested Merge target as suggested above either as the Misato Katsuragi article does have a section for other media in which this would fit as well.Lorraine Crane (talk) 01:50, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: So far, redirect looks likely, but more discussion would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 04:45, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]