Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Di Scala

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:21, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Di Scala

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician per music notability guidelines - TheMagnificentist 10:59, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet the guidelines for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:50, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. I also note that most of the material is completely unsourced, which several of the key points that might show notability are from local, Liverpool, media. Liverpool has not been connected to the rest of the world as it was in the 1950s when The Beatles were forming. I also note that we usually delete BLPs about DJs and music producers, because they are so common, such as this subject. I'm sorry to be so harsh, but this is a mess. Bearian (talk) 02:51, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.