Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miguel Azeez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:20, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Miguel Azeez

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD deleted because Azeez played in the UEFA Europa League and not the Irish League. The team he played in the Europa League however is part of the Irish League, which isn't in WP:FPL. WP:NFOOTY says that a player is notable when they play in a game in which both sides are fully-professional, Dundalk isn't. The article also fails WP:GNG. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 04:05, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 04:16, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 04:17, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 04:17, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He's played in the Europa League group stages, which we have always considered to meet the criteria. Also by the way; the Irish League is Northern Ireland's league, the Republic of Ireland's league is the League of Ireland. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 07:49, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment That isn't true - both teams have to play in a fully professional league. Dougal18 (talk) 10:04, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 10:11, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 12:20, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I can't see how any of the coverage would be enough to pass WP:GNG and this clearly fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Alternatively, this could be sent to draft if there is consensus that the player is likely to be notable soon. Spiderone 16:02, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He passes WP:GNG [1]. User:GiantSnowman once again doesn't 'see' the sources for GNG although they exist. --Corwin of Amber (talk) 10:53, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

that source was not present in the article and on its own does not mean Azeez passes GNG. See also WP:AGF. Giant Snowman 11:16, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for footballers they need to meet our football inclusion criteria, and he just plain does not.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:33, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFOOTY failure. Number 5 7 17:02, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.