Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft office 2012
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 11:32, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Microsoft office 2012 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Product has not been announced by Microsoft; and despite the source article linked from Ars Technica, only speculative information has been revealed and is available. As such, the article violates WP:CRYSTAL. mhking (talk) 14:03, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. We'll obviously have an article on the next version of MS Office at some point, but this fails WP:CRYSTAL for now as speculation from a single source not affiliated with MS. Pcap ping 15:48, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. - we can always recreate this closer to launch afer the betas appear. Racepacket (talk) 15:49, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Admittedly, there will be a point in time when this is notable, that time isn't now. It also currently violates Wp:CRYSTAL. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 16:08, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - crystal balling. Canterbury Tail talk 16:15, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CHRYSTAL. LotLE×talk 08:53, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL; not enough confirmed information to make this article useful yet. It can easily be recreated when the time comes. Cocytus [»talk«] 02:17, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.