Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft LifeChat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:25, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft LifeChat

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:SOAPBOX. No non primary sources in article. A search reveals only storefronts, no news results or significant coverage. Darcyisverycute (talk) 23:04, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Darcyisverycute (talk) 23:04, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:SOAPBOX SchoolChromebookUser (talk) 12:56, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There's this [1], says it's a reprint from [2], so I'd count it as one decent source. Oaktree b (talk) 00:13, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - one source is not significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 19:12, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.