Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Sinclair Sanders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep or "nomination withdrawn", take your pick. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:33, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Sinclair Sanders

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NOTABILITY, only sources I can find on the internet are self-published

Sorry, forgot to sign it! Brickie (talk) 13:06, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silver seren^C 17:25, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. Silver seren^C 17:25, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have put in a number of reliable sources and rewritten the article. Sanders is notable. Silver seren^C 17:25, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly my Google-fu fails. All I could find were the self-published sites, or other things quoting or mirroring them. Looks like there is more out there that I couldn't find, so I agree, keep. Brickie (talk) 10:09, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It is very difficult to judge an article like this when it is such a minute stub. He sounds a bit FRINGE. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:08, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

...you should be judging the sources, not the article. AfD is just to establish notability. You should be using the sources to determine if he is notable or not from the available sources. FRINGE or not, he has valid sourcing. Silver seren^C 21:45, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.