Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MichaelDabhi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Tagged for CSD G4 via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Dabhi (2nd nomination) so I deleted. There are several versions in Draft space, too. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:23, 27 November 2021 (UTC) Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:23, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MichaelDabhi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No actual evidence of notability: sources are press releases, puff pieces, or sites of dubious reliability. Article has been salted at Michael Dabhi, but that was a while ago and the current version has more recent sourcing. Fram (talk) 09:14, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 09:14, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 09:14, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; additionally, none of the positions he has held even come close to conferring notability. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:52, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't qualify WP:NPOL. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete and SALT. Fails GNG and NPOL, but this should be deleted under WP:G4 and WP:G11. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:15, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.