Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mi Propio Auto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:29, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mi Propio Auto

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

this is a textbook for high schools, connected to a system of learning which appears notable, but which is itself of no particular importance. author is a redirect to the teaching method he copyrighted, whose article seems overly detailed. publisher likewise not currently notable. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:46, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:06, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:06, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - If there was an article for Blaine Ray, I would have suggested redirecting. Although TPR Storytelling mentions him several times, redirecting this book to that article wouldn't be appropriate. Unfortunately, Google News and Books found no evidence of third-party sources. SwisterTwister talk 21:56, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 22:08, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I wasn't able to find anything that showed that this book has received any independent and reliable coverage, nor anything to show that it's really all that widely used in various classrooms. I agree with ST that redirecting this to the TPR article probably wouldn't be appropriate in this circumstance.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:28, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.