Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meta index image
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. As WP:CSD#A11 §FreeRangeFrogcroak 06:09, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Meta index image (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article on some non-notable metadata coding written by the developer of this code. Author admits self-promotion on article talk page. Article has already been G11-speedied once, taking to AfD because the current version didn't seen quite blatant enough to tag it as such again, didn't seem to quite fit into an A7 category, and figured author would immediately revert a prod tag. --Finngall talk 16:17, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - From looking around the developer us using Wikipedia to assist in drumming up money to develop it as it's in kickstarter and another "give me money to make/develop this". Fails WP:N and WP:RS - Pmedema (talk) 16:41, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete The linked articles don't really give any information about this idea, and it hasn't been funded. yet by Kickstarter. Frmorrison (talk) 21:27, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of notability, purely promotional. Theroadislong (talk) 21:37, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - per WP:UPANDCOMING and WP:MADEUPONEDAY, as well as the obvious WP:PROMOTION. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:35, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Obviously. Per nom. and prior comments. --Jersey92 (talk) 23:58, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.