Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megablitz
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:19, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Megablitz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I think the page should be deleted because it's been unsourced for 15 years, and after trying to bring it to editors' attention, Piotrus recommends that I come here, after he did a BEFORE search and found nothing reliable to source the page. Since this might be controversial, I did not use the Prod system. Bearian (talk) 14:10, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. I am also not finding any sources to establish notability, just primary sources and forum posts. Rjjiii (talk) 15:40, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. No source to establish notability. The associated sources are not relevant for inclusion either. Cameremote (talk) @gonisulaimann 16:19, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games and Military. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:52, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per above lack of sources Metallurgist (talk) 18:59, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and the above comments stating lack of sources. Surayeproject3 (talk) 11:56, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.