Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media Operations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:43, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Media Operations

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a new usage of the term made by the article's creator; the one reference doesn't use the term "Media Operations". Article creator banned for promotional edits. power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:23, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it's a new usage of the term. "Content services" is a term sometimes used for recording, ingest and playback. Playout is already an article. Enbytv (talk) 17:27, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the reasons stated above, and the fact that this article doesn’t really have a place on an encyclopedia anyways. WildChild300^Talk 23:55, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:08, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NEOLOGISM. This does not appear to be a common use of the term, which more often seems to refer to a job (perhaps Media management or Director of communications). By the way, given that Media Operations Group also exists, a disambiguation page may be in order, though probably at Media operations. Cnilep (talk) 03:37, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.