Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MeWe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:47, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MeWe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant promotion. Press release. non-notable startup. nothing significant about it. Light2021 (talk) 20:23, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 20:29, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 20:35, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Searches are made more awkward by unrelated similarly-named companies, but I am not seeing better than start-up propositional coverage for this social network, including a passing mention among "Startups Vying for Hype at SXSW" in 2016 ([1] – via HighBeam (subscription required) ), for example. Nor does Alexa just past 50,000th in the USA indicate better for attained notability. Fails WP:NWEB, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 20:56, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete clearly a promotional piece, created in 2013 by a single purpose account. Fails WP:CORP for lack of in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources. Not ranked in any published list of "social media". Also delete the redirect at Sgrouples, its earlier name. --Bejnar (talk) 05:42, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 22:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of notability author puts fourth non applicable companies and past endeavors of owners as a motivation for notability. Clearly fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:NWEB. HDavis2017 (talk) 07:26, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.