Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maximizing dictionary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Big Dom 06:36, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maximizing dictionary

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found zero sources for this term. The only source in the article is offline. See Minimizing dictionary AfD also. SL93 (talk) 02:43, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment": They both appear to be a neologism by Sandro Nielsen. SL93 (talk) 02:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. COnfirmed lack of any usage. Staszek Lem (talk) 02:54, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, leaning delete Not sure if it's received significant coverage. Can't see this article get past stub class. At the very least it should be incorporated into Dictionary. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 04:15, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Even if the expression was commonly used all this and the other article does is define this aspect of dictionaries.Borock (talk) 06:56, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG Stuartyeates (talk) 09:47, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.