Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Slidel (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 03:28, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Slidel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most sources are wikipedia mirrors or websites like wikipedia that are free to edit. This also was subject to afd and was deleted and this person still isn't notable. I can't find any real third party sources which tells me this person fails WP:BLP Everyone Dies In the End (talk) 21:05, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete most links barely mention the subject of the article. Among the ones that do is #6 which links to the freedictionary.com article which is taken from Wikipedia. Warfieldian (talk) 23:19, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Some sources are wiki mirrors, some are not, and some printed texts unavailable on-line. However, I agree with all of the above - and that the article should be deleted asap. A-stiller-mind (talk) 06:09, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agreed: there do seem no ‘real’ third party sources. This conveys that the person does indeed fail WP:BLP. SlipperySid (talk) 10:03, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.