Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margie Harrison

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Icewedge (talk) 02:49, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Margie Harrison

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe that it matters whether or not this person was the "first centerfold"; that bit of information would be better served in the Playboy magazine article. Article fails WP:PORNBIO. NW (Talk) 12:21, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Being the first playboy playmate, if verified, would satisfy criteria 3 of PORNBIO for me. I am concerned about whether this claim is someone's original research. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:50, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep found and cited first playmate info. Morbidthoughts (talk) 01:04, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable as all hell. --Rebel1916 (talk) 03:51, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with kudos to Morbidthoughts. Another source is Playboy: The Complete Centerfolds by Hugh Hefner & Dave Hickey... showing the first apearance of the first ever Playmate of the Month... Margie Harrison as Miss January 1954 and her return as Miss June, same year. Sure, while Marilyn Monroe graced the very first issue in December 1953, it was Harrrison who was the first "Playmate". Heff oughta know. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:51, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable first. If the deletionists win on this article, please userfy to my userspace so that I don't have to ask an admin for the article text. Thanks, Dismas|^(talk) 22:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as passing BASIC and Pornbio#3 - Stillwaterising (talk) 04:51, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - what ever happened to the guidance of ATD? It seems to be accepted that editors can nominate everything for deletion on sight without any consequences. Poor show. Ash (talk) 08:53, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and avoid the inevitable press coverage about how wikipedia thought the first centerfold wasn't notable. I saw recently that a slew of early playmates were prodded; I don't really care about these articles, but many people do.--Milowent (talk) 18:38, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.