Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mango Languages

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:41, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mango Languages

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Queried speedy delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:58, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Gets a decent amount if Gnews hits, marginally notable, but enough to keep it here. Angryapathy (talk) 15:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 00:42, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Some GNews hits, but these mostly seem to be press releases. The ones that aren't consist of town papers discussing how the local library offers subscriptions to their products. The mentions in larger papers like the Boston Globe are trivial two-sentence items [1]. Per WP:CORP, "attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability." cab (talk) 00:42, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lack of reliable secondary sources means questionable notability. I find only the same sort of passing mentions and local promotions that CAB did. Cnilep (talk) 04:13, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.