Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ManagePro (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus, default to keep. Non-admin closure ShawnIsHere: Now in colors 13:14, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- ManagePro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Inelligible for CSD G4 because the result of the previous AFD was SD. consider this a relisting to get an actual consensus. UtherSRG (talk) 15:40, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I did not review the sourcing in detail in the article, just skipping over obviously useless stuff like BusinessWire press releases. Amongst that, [1], [2], and [3] all provide coverage about the software. My own search turned up this case study article, and this product review. That's sufficient to establish the product as notable. -- Whpq (talk) 16:43, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.