Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man Luen Choon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Fritzpoll (talk) 07:53, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Man Luen Choon

Advertisement Altt311 (talk) 19:57, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Well-reference. The article is useful for students who like to learn chinese history and modern art painting basics. The resources can add more details of painting techniques plus artists' history. Margarettk (talk) 08:06, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as spam. -- Whpq (talk) 16:28, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:43, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pastor Theo (talk) 01:22, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 02:45, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I removed all the puffery and irrelevant materials. The question remains of whether the articles in the "External links" section are sufficient to establish notability. A lot of them read like advertorials to me ... cab (talk) 02:45, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable. Seems local interest. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable. If this store with its history and community involvement were in NYC there would be no question about notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:55, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:RS standards. Spammy language can be rewritten. Pastor Theo (talk) 03:05, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep The puffery (eg the 'Promotion...' para) has to go, of course, but subject appears to be an established player on the HK retail business and art scene. The WP:RS requirement is just met IMHO and I think it may be worth someone who knows how to put out a shout to any Hong Kong wikiproject here - see if anyone can source more (eg. non-internets) information. Plutonium27 (talk) 15:53, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.