Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maggs and Trish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus was to delete all five articles. If anybody wants to work on these (i.e. research and add the required sources), any admin can move the deleted text into your private user space. -- RoySmith (talk) 11:33, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maggs and Trish

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable evidence of notability. The Guardian page listed as a reference is not staff-written, but rather a reprint of a page at Last.fm. I don't think they charted on a recognized chart, and I don't think that digital distribution through RouteNote counts as distribution on a notable minor label.

The following articles are also part of this AfD nomination:

Rachel Osler
The Dunnes
Trish Dunne
Linda Brown (singer) Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:41, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:48, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:48, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't find anything that shows how any of these artists meet the guidelines for inclusion set out at WP:MUSICBIO or the general notability guide. — sparklism ^hey! 11:02, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This artist was signed with the label SONY but were dropped in the 1990's. I believe that there album Close To You was in the Irish Album Charts in the 1990's also. This artist has appeared on BBC radio stations to give interviews such as Radio Leeds, Radio Aire and Magic 828. Sources for this artist are difficult to find but I think the page should remain. The other artists should be deleted as they have no significance on their own. As with this page any information that isn't sourced properly should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.30.117.165 (talk) 13:13, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all unless proper third party sources are provided. The article tells us they had a small amount of fame, and released notable songs, but gives no evidence of that. Saying your notable isn't really a notability claim. It is unfortunate that there may be sources that are hard to find, because they're offline, due to their age. But, the onus is on whoever wants inclusion to find them. --Rob (talk) 00:01, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article to be deleted until sources are found by this artist — Preceding unsigned comment added by Novasion (talk • contribs) 15:10, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way of taking the article offline without deleting it so that what is already there is kept until sources are found that way it would be less time consuming. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grandpa152 (talk • contribs) 16:22, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Grandpa152: Yes, the article could be userfied if you intend work on it. — sparklism ^hey! 07:44, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't many sources online there may be some in archive newspapers from the early 1990's — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.29.139.12 (talk) 22:30, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all and re-include if sources are found --User:oslers01 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 14:27, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Selective merge to Margaret Talbot, per WP:BAND. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 09:47, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.