Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madden NFL 2010

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SNOW delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 19:01, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Madden NFL 2010

Direct contradiction of WP:CRYSTAL, speculation - only source states it has not been confirmed Fin ©™ 00:23, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Definitely exists, but barely could be considered a game. - A Link to the Past (talk) 00:24, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 00:26, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why delete it when the page is gonna be re created again petty soon. Ice (talk) 00:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We don't create articles based on the fact that they will eventually warrant existing. - A Link to the Past (talk) 01:14, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This page is really not needed until some game details are released. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.47.209.8 (talk) 01:36, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:CRYSTAL. Wait until there's more to verify about it. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 02:46, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete We all know EA's gonna make a 2010 (although it might not be named that), but only one source has stated it as confirmed. Overall, delete. RC-0722 ^361.0/1 04:36, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd just like to point out the source given in the article does not confirm it - it's based on speculation and explicitly says that it's not confirmed. Fin ©™ 07:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Far too early, cmon. This is just ridiculous. Monster Under Your Bed ^(talk) 12:29, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This is one of those cases were Wikipedia doesn't make sense to a lot of people. But policies and guidelines do not allow for speculation no matter the likelihood of it actually occurring because no one can predict the future with 100% certainty. While the topic and article are harmless, allowing something like this is a slipper slope that can lead to something negative being put up based purely on speculation. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 13:36, 22 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]
Comment So which NFL team does Tim Tebow play on in 2010? Mandsford (talk) 13:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 'da Bears!! (Sorry, I was required by law to say that.) MuZemike (talk) 23:02, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fine delete it then Ice (talk) 18:36, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like some wine with that cheese? MuZemike (talk) 05:44, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let's stay on point. I'm sure Icealien created the article in good faith. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 07:25, 23 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Delete. Wikipedia isn't a crystal ball. RobJ1981 (talk) 21:46, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — this is like using a crystal ball to search for another crystal ball. MuZemike (talk) 23:02, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete now - creator requested deletion combined with WP:SNOWBALL. - A Link to the Past (talk) 03:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, I just want to note that the article should NOT have to go through a deletion review, just require that it have a substantial announcement - ie, a trailer, or coverage on a major news web site or magazine. - A Link to the Past (talk) 06:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strongest Delete — No source. Publisher have not announced the game yet. --SkyWalker (talk) 05:17, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - tagged as G7. MrKIA11 (talk) 18:56, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.