Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macedonophobia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:13, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Macedonophobia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced neologism, pure original research and synthesis. Crusio (talk) 16:22, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as per Crusio's opinion. Jingiby (talk) 17:23, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
delete—although i don't think this is a neologism. it doesn't matter, though. there are multiple sources that attest to its use, and any native speaker of english could conceivably utter this at any moment, but no sources discuss the word itself in an encyclopedic manner, so the article should be deleted.— alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 18:19, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are all of three published sources that use the term,[1] two of them over forty years old, all of unknown neutrality or reliability. Each uses the term once, in passing. Definitely not notable. First Light (talk) 21:23, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- And yes, the article itself is pure synthesis and original research. First Light (talk) 00:05, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Total WP:OR. Athenean (talk) 23:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Neologism; original research. No reliable sources widely use the term. /ƒETCH COMMS / 01:56, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Seems to be made up of original research; a seemingly non-notable neologism. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 20:14, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Originally researched neologism →Σ τ c. 02:46, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Inks.LWC (talk) 07:30, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clear WP:OR --Odie5533 (talk) 16:48, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 16:52, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 16:52, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Macedonia-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 16:52, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 16:53, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ~~searching revealed no hits~~actually there are hits;WP:OR;WP:SYN;no referencesCurb Chain (talk) 11:00, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.