Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mace of Cuthbert
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of major artifacts in Dungeons & Dragons. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:10, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Mace of Cuthbert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This does not establish notability. TTN (talk) 01:36, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 01:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 01:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep or merge to List of major artifacts in Dungeons & Dragons. BOZ (talk) 04:03, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of major artifacts in Dungeons & Dragons. No non-primary sources talking about it in any depth. Its already present with all the standard information on the Major Artifacts list here, so there really isn't much else needed to Merge at this point. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 17:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect or merge as above. I might recommend merging to Saint Cuthbert, but I don't know how notable he is. Josh Milburn (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- Merge per BOZ. Like Vecna, the character came along after the 1st ed. AD&D artifact named after him. Jclemens (talk) 08:06, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.