Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacDas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted per A7 by Nyttend (talk · contribs). Non-admin closure. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:22, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MacDas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable university club. No independent refs in page and the only things approaching a WP:RS I could find in google/google news is [1] which is good, but not nearly enough. Procedural de-PROD. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:33, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete No content, no sourcing. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:55, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Absolutely non-notable, fails WP:CLUB. How did the article survive this long? WWGB (talk) 01:26, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete by all that is holy. Seriously, no rationale necessary. tedder (talk) 01:31, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete, No indication of importance of organization. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:45, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.