Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MSR Flug-Charter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 12:19, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MSR Flug-Charter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This small, non-scheduled corporate charter airline clearly fails WP:CORP. It has not been the subject of any significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. There is nothing to be said about it other than it existed. Obviously, MSR Flug-Charter had not any significant impact on the aviation industry. FoxyOrange (talk) 07:40, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:07, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:37, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:09, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:09, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I'm not German and don't speak German so I won't be able to help much but a search at Google News at Google News and Google Books did provide results but nothing substantial about this company. Unfortunately, searches at German English newspapers The Munich Eye and Spiegel International did not provide anything either. To the article's additional dismay, it seems the German article doesn't provide much info either aside from the bankruptcy. SwisterTwister talk 01:46, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; unable to find significant coverage in secondary sources. —Theopolisme (talk) 04:15, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.