Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MSPoweruser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:10, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MSPoweruser

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NWEB; written like an advertisement Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I'll make it more objective then. But will this alone help meeting the WP:NWEB criteria? DGital (talk) 11:12, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable, per searches. This newly create page claims it is a publication of Reflector media, which is not itself a notable company, but does exist and has a website. Even Reflector media's website does not list this title - see the "our brands" section here [1] which lists a couple of titles but not this one. If even the publisher doesn't see this as worth a mention, it is clearly not notable for a page of its own. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Sirfurboy🏄. Will adding the publication to the Reflector Media's brands page change your opinion? DGital (talk) 11:13, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am afraid not, no. It would not be an independent source. I merely drew attention to that lack to point out that even the publisher does not provide information from which a page could be created. But to be notable for an article, it needs to have significant coverage in independent reliable secondary sources. At this stage, none appear to exist. If you are in a position where you could change Reflector media's coverage of this on their web page then it is likely that you would have an undisclosed conflict of interest. See WP:COI. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 11:51, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per user above, not notable to be on this project. Normanhunter2 (talk) 13:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Technology, and Computing. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 14:13, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable standalone. IgelRM (talk) 20:38, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.