Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MKE (my Knowledge Explorer)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to mKR (programming language).--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 13:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- MKE (my Knowledge Explorer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
non-notable program whose article creator appears to be in conflict as its likely programmer ju66l3r (talk) 08:02, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please also note the related discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/MKR_(programming_language)
- The deletion of mKR and mKE seems to be one issue. I will post all my comments on the mKR deletion page. Rhmccullough (talk) 09:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per nom. Proxy User (talk) 12:56, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- brewcrewer (yada, yada) 16:05, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As per my comment on the MKR (programming language) afd, mostly gibberish and no sources that seems reliable. Rehevkor ✉ 00:39, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete mKE. I don't like it myself. Rhmccullough (talk) 22:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep mKR. I think it's better already, and I'm getting good advice from NoDepositNoReturn re further changes. Rhmccullough (talk) 22:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- DeleteNot very clear. Author himself seems to be in two minds about this. - Amog | Talk • contribs 13:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep mKE. After giving it some more thought -- it would be good to have a very short mKE (like what's there now) to point mKE/mKR users to the "right" place -- mKR. Rhmccullough (talk) 16:46, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: A redirect would serve that purpose. If the language page is kept, then this page could be turned into a redirect that points to that page easily enough. ju66l3r (talk) 16:48, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I hadn't thought of that - sounds good. Rhmccullough (talk) 16:50, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: You have voted one delete, and two keeps. Please make up your mind, you only have one vote. - Amog | Talk • contribs 16:54, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I hadn't thought of that - sounds good. Rhmccullough (talk) 16:50, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: A redirect would serve that purpose. If the language page is kept, then this page could be turned into a redirect that points to that page easily enough. ju66l3r (talk) 16:48, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.