Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MFortune

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:30, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MFortune

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can only find sources about mFortune that have been published in specialist publications like Casino City Times or Blackjack Champ, and so I don't think it has the depth of coverage necessary for a Wikipedia article. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 14:45, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete failing WP:N & WP:OR. -- Jelly Soup (talk) 02:34, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 12:24, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No evidence of substantial coverage by independent sources. Coverage limited to publications with a very small and very narrow readership base. Outside of that base, it has no informational value, and thus, no encyclopedic value. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 13:45, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.