Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M'Ress

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep on the issue of keep vs delete, no consensus on the issue of merging. That can be discussed on the article's talk page. Ron Ritzman (talk) 15:07, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

M'Ress

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completly unsourced, this article has no sources or citations to establish the notability. JJ98 (Talk) 00:37, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or Merge to a character list. While unquestoinably not as iconic as the core Star Trek crew, she was a regular during the animated series and later kept showing up in the comics and novels. She seems to have been among the more memorable aspects of the cartoon, and sources reflect that. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:37, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because she was the first furry crush of many people from that generation and I think she's kinda hot myself oh come on, I had to say it. Seriously, weak keep per Starblind's source. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 02:24, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to character list and delete non-free image. --EEMIV (talk) 02:59, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If there's a good merge target identified, then Merge e.g. to a character list or to the animated series' main article. Failing that, there's probably enough sourcing to keep because after all, it's Star Trek, and we all know there's a ton of sources for Kirk's underwear somewhere... :-) Jclemens (talk) 04:20, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sources seem easy to find such as Star Trek 101 and so the article can be improved per our editing policy. Colonel Warden (talk) 23:37, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, trivial sources are always easy to find. Colonel Warden is also a member of the Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron. WikiuserNI (talk) 15:32, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to appropriate character list (List of Star Trek characters if a better target isn't available). No indication of mention beyond the most avid of Trekkie fan-literature. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 11:38, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to the general list of Star Trek characters. WikiuserNI (talk) 15:33, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Starblind. Edward321 (talk) 02:28, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.