Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy Seton-Watson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hugh Seton-Watson. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:05, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lucy Seton-Watson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

For an unknown period she was editor of "International Affairs" (unsourced). No other notability. Rightly flagged since July 2009 as failing WP:GNG. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 12:14, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to her granddad's page, or to International Affairs, which ever is more appropriate. Paul MacDermott (talk) 15:47, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:52, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:52, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

REdirect -- probably to her father. A redirect to International Affairs, which looks like a respectable acadmic journal would be appropriate if the article mentioned her editorship. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:46, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing the WP:GNG due to a lack of sources. A redirect might be suitable if someone can find a suitable way to mention her in the article about her grandfather. Vcessayist (talk) 02:06, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:BEFORE. There are a few sources at Google scholar, as well as Google books. Bearian (talk) 19:28, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ΛΧΣ21™ 18:42, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:23, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - At a glance, seems that primary notability relates to family relationship to Hugh Seton-Watson. Carrite (talk) 15:37, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Jeez. The only thing she's doing is breathing. Redirect it--anywhere. It hardly matters where. Better yet, just scrub it off. Qworty (talk) 10:46, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.