Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy Merriam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:25, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lucy Merriam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable 7 year old actress. Two minor roles. The rest of article mentions numerous modeling appearances, only one commercial is "on camera". Google news search gets 7 hits, all of which just list her as part of cast on one role, or in local talent show. No incoming articles link to her page. Previously PROD, and I am positive it was deleted, (I saw red link), but now it is back. I think she needs more time to develop a real career before she has a page. Is this article being saved because her picture was a featured photo? --Logical Fuzz (talk) 21:41, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as article fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 10:17, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now or incubate. She seems like a promising young actress, but an article on her may be premature. Bearian (talk) 20:36, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete even if she is the subject of a featured picture, that is not a claim to notability. Not enough independent coverage. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 23:25, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice for recreation when/if her career grows. Impressive as 202 episodes of All My Children might otherwise be, unless it is shown that she has a major cult following or fanbase, its not enough for now. Currently failing WP:ENT and WP:GNG [1], perhaps author User:StarbriteQueen might request userfication? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:39, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.