Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lua Player

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lua Player

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, fails notability requirements, fails WP:V also seems to be WP:Promotion as well. FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 17:21, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unsourced (unless you count first party external links sprinkled throughout the article), written/formatted more like a retail listing or company's product page than an encyclopedia article. Fails the WP:GNG, and even if sources were found, its pretty much a WP:TNT situation. Sergecross73 msg me 19:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Found nothing worth reliable from my search, except a few links from GitHub, which can't be used to prove the subject's notability. Fails WP:GNG. However per Serge, the article is promotional in tone. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:40, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.